Racial Order at the Cape

Meanwhile, the Dutch due east India bon ton did not interfere with the slave trade, which in this period include mutilation and torture.1 Giliomee and Elphick also note the pattern of European enslavement or killing of blacks by new settlers on the eastern frontier, in the Namaqua tribe area around the Fish River. Basically, the European settlers were go forth to their own devices by colonial government administrators, who seem to meet had their own agenda of exploiting Africa in mind. As they say, "Although stable relations and various forms of cooperation existed at times between the various peoples, encounter was pervasive. Because it had both a racial and a class dimension, negotiations were less(prenominal) effective in resolving disputes than is often the case in purely economic conflicts."2

Nor did Britain, which had established Cape Colony, interfere with Dutch policy of allowing slavery as a component of racial relations, as long as Holland had to look to Britain for military exculpation of its own colonies or administration.

In this connection, Ume says that apartheid itself had its origin with the Dutch East India Company, which in 1682 allowed whites to interfere with making emancipation of slaves easy. The British, in fact, select separatist policies almost from the beginning, concluding that white exclusiveness was never questioned when the opposition came from blacks.3 Thus the British policies never cha

5 Martin Legassick, Richard Elphick, and Hermann

Schutte, Gerrit, Snyders, Henry, Elphick, Richard, and Giliomee,

then Egypt forcibly extended its hegemony siemens of Khartoum.

Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!