Arab States Lacks Democracy

Huntington (1984) argues that frugal growth is the important requisite for promoting democracy, mainly because it distributes income to different classes or groups who gain a gradation of force play that enables them to influence policies. As Anderson (2001) says of Huntington's view, "He set an economic ?zone of transition corresponding to the upper tierce of the World Bank's middle-income countries in which traditional authoritarianism led the counsel either to communism or to democracy....a market economic and a bourgeoisie appear to be necessary, if not sufficient for the upshot of democracy" (1). This is an important question in terms of policy. Arab rulers and fundamentalism's revitalisation in the heart East generally resist elected market reforms because they are viewed as a threat to power and control. Therefore, many Arab nations remain richer than they are developed because Arab rulers maintain rigid authoritarian control over the economy. This increases the reliance of the people on the state for their welfare and decreases productivity and free market mechanisms that would nourish greater maturement and more democratic institutions.

The following variables inform the lack of democracy and underdevelopment in the Arab states:

Lack of precept, particularly among women.

Restrictions on free speech and the media.

Islamic fundamentalism in direct foeman to democratic institutions.

Abootalebi, A. R. Civil society, democracy, and the Middle East. Middle East Review of International Affairs, 2.3 (Sep 1998), 1-18.

The issue of education also pertains to the lack of gracious rights and educational opportunities for women. Extending suffrage to women and increase opportunities for education are a vital part of back up spur development in Arab states. In the 1996 Human study Report of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP), analysts concluded that "every country that sustained both human development and economic growth accelerated advances in human development first, or pursued both objectives simultaneously" (Report, 2002, 5).

It is in large measure the failure of leadership to tap and expand human capabilities and resources that stifles development in the Middle East. Such development is critical for the governance of democratic institutions, because it is only through such development that disparate groups in society will begin to exhibit virtually parity with respect to policy influence. According to Abootalebi (1998), the "emergence of civil society in the Middle East will extend when well-institutionalized, well-organized groups are in a position to exert sound pressure on ruling elites to open the political system. both strong states and weak societies are barriers to democratization in development countries" (8).

Anderson, L. Arab democracy: Dismal prospects. World Policy Journal, 18.3 (Fall 2001), 1-9.

Huntington, S. P. Will more countries become democratic? Political Science Quarterly, 99.2 (Summer 1984), 193-218.

Unwillingness of leaders to implement reforms that change the status quo.

There are some(prenominal) concepts that must be defined in order to bring home the bacon deeper insight into the objectives and goals of increasing democracy and development in Arab states. For the purposes of this research, the exposition of democracy provided by Huntington (1984) will best suit this summary: "A political system is defined as
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!