Working Mothers and Its Effect to Children

M differents involvement in the labor outcome displays signifi washstandt increase in the last decade as swell up as reliance to non- agnate child c ar. Considering the traditional view of yieldhood and parenting, this antecedent raises the question regarding childrens offbeat composition their experiences are engaging in professional cultivate. Such question is generally non a immature one. Various studies drop subscribed on researches about childrens wel furthermoste in relation of their parents bearing for many old age now.However, in that location are still no definitive results particularly in answering the question whether a condition where a vex is operative part or full-time result in a worse condition for the welfare of the children in comparison to a condition where the mother is constantly at home. This question is also in line to questions whether sweetening in works hours has particular exploits to childrens condition. In this paper, I lead addres s the issue by reviewing the proponents and opponents of the cerebration that works mothers causes forbid affects toward their children and present my own opinions and arguments to the discussion.I. Summary of PositionsThe proponents of the opinion are supported by the traditional view of mother hood and parental roles. Thus, they generally pass a modality the more(prenominal) popular side of the debate in social studies. In empirical perspective, proponents of the sentiment uses numerous studies which relate childrens behavior to parental behavior and discover that children with work parents at different ages performs curter than other mathematical group of children in several cognitive and social tests and observations (Brooks Gun, 2002, Aizer, 2002).One field of force revealed that infants in the age of one to three years old will have a sorryer cognitive performance when their mothers are works in their babies startle year of life. Another study indicated that adolesc ence who spend more time unattended by their parents will have poorer academic performance and more apparent to evolve in in socially poor behaviors.The opponent of the sentiment uses the flaws of the researches above. just about of the studies that generated acceptable results were studies about how children would be proscribely affected by poor billing or poor environment. One study raze results in the increase in childrens academic performance as their parents gained break in jobs which mean longer running(a) hours.Opponents of the sentiment argued that it was not the fact that the mother is working that negatively affected childrens welfare and development, it was the fact that the children was pose on worse care than their parents while their parents were at work. In the flat coat of this argument, better jobs would result the ability to lead better care for the children while their parents are working, and thus would not necessarily result negative effect for the children (Conger 1994, Dearing, 2001).II. Statement of PositionMy personal position in this matter is base on logic and empirical studies. Although traditional sentiment and our intuition allow us to believe that working mother would obviously resulted poorer care of the children, there is no veritable proof of the sentiment. Statistical researches have so far failed to conclude in positive that working mothers do cause negative effects toward their children. Some have clustered results and s open-eyedly even contract the opposite of the sentiment. In short, I stand in negative that working mothers generate negative effect toward children.Another reason of my standpoint is the reflexion that childrens welfare consist of various factors quite an only few. Researches who movement to find correlation betwixt childrens welfare and parental behavior are mostly concern over childrens cognitive abilities and academic performance. Few true(a)ly consider the social and actual men tal and physiologic effect of working mother toward the children.On the contrary to the discussed sentiment, a study revealed that there is no correlation between childrens poor dietary quality to the mother being active in professional work ( functional Mothers, 2005). There is also no statistical correlation between the development of childrens behavior to the fact that their mothers are working or not (Anderson, 2003).Most of the cases where children having poor cognitive and physiological development and academic performance, and their mothers are working, displayed other factors behind the working mother factors. They were these other factors, equivalent poor environment, poor and unprofessional care given by the commonwealth in charge of the child while the mother was working, poor learning and insensitive mothers, which causes the negative effect toward the children (Brooks-Gun, 2002).III.Multi pagan ApplicationThe state in which the sentiment is popular is different in di fferent gardenings. In Europe and the join States, working mothers are considered more common phenomena. There are fewer concerns over the issues of child care by working mothers especially with the approachability of professional caretaker services. Within these cultures, the fear over neglected children is also less(prenominal) due to the presence of various studies revealing that there is no actual evidence that working mothers generate children with poorer state of mind, body and soul.In other cultures, especially more traditional ones, the sentiment has a stronger existence. Some cultures even consider the sentiment as a general truth. In these cultures, loss the child in their growth stages are considered taboo rather than generating ill effect toward children. The consideration is influenced by socio-cultural thinking rather than scientific thoughts.However, if researches are to be conducted within these countries, the result would be in the advantage of proponents of th e sentiment. This is caused by the state of the culture which may not be able to provide alternative care (beside the birth mother) with similar or better quality. Furthermore, beliefs and cultural suggestions contribute to making the sentiment a reality within these countries.IV. scathing literacyDespite the popularity of the sentiment that working mother has negative effect on children, statistical researches revealed otherwise. A study even revealed that children at the age 10-12 displayed increase cognitive and academic performance as their parents working hours increased. The researcher believes that this erratic result has several explanations.The prototypic is the fact that increased working hours agency better pay and increased ability to provide better care or assistance to childrens daily life and education. The second is considering the psychological effect on children as they watch their parents achieving success is life. In some families, parents achievement is cons idered to have a significant influence that boosted childrens self esteem and efforts (Conger 1994).This strengthened my argument that most researches neglected psychological factors in childrens development as they define the correlation between working mothers and negative effects toward children.V. Civil LiteracyA large portion of working mother throughout the world has no choice but to engage in professional work. Thus, getting the truth out about how working mothers affected childrens conditions and development is very much important because it will influence the lives of these women and their families.In the developed world where people have more access to researches and studies, it is more possible for working mothers to understand the risks that they might fountain and how to reduce them. In the developing world on the other hand, this sentiment might lead to poorer condition of children and the entire family because mothers are not allowed to engage in professional work a nd bring in financial contributions.VI.Science LiteracyResearchers observe that in the age of 3, children whose mother are working in the first year of the childrens life have poorer cognitive performance comparing to childrens whose mother are not working.However, similar results are not discovered when researchers observe other stages of childrens life and age. Some argued that in further ages, the test instrument is no longer able to take into account various factors that influences the children cognitive behavior and therefore, unable to display conclusive results (Brooks-Gun, 2002). In my opinion, this is just scientific evidence that there is no actual justification to the sentiment that working mothers negatively affects their childrenVII.Values LiteracyScientific and cultural discussions are not one and the same. In most occurrences, their encounter generated contradictive opinions regarding the same phenomenon. This is also the case within this particular discussion. Cult urally speaking, mothers are the natural caretaker of children at any age. Going against this sentiment is not something many of us would check into with, especially in a more traditional society.Nevertheless, in the up-to-the-minute decade, we have witness a change of culture, especially in the joined States and the European countries. The change was first caused by necessities and later become a trend. Today, there are many women who voluntarily choose to work rather than stay home with their children all day. Therefore, I personally believe that culture can be gradually shaped by altered way of thinking in the community.VIII. ConclusionIn conclusion, despite the growing new trend, I believe that being a working mother can be a necessity rather than a choice. In light of this condition, it is necessary for us to justly identify whether being a working mother means generating negative effect toward ones children. Researches showed that there are no actual correlation between a m other who actively engage in professional and the negative effect suffered by children.On the other hand, other studies revealed that factors like mothers insensitiveness, poor environment, poor quality of the caretaker and other factors are the ones who actually have a negative effect toward childrens cognitive performance, academic performance and dietary quality.BibliographyAizer, Anna. 2002. Home Alone Supervision After School and Child mien. Center for Research on Child Wellbeing, Wallace Hall, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544Anderson, Patricia M., Kristin F. Butcher, Phillip B. Levine. 2003. Maternal purpose and Overweight Children, Journal of Health Economics, 22(3), 477-504.Brooks-Gun, Jeanne. Han, Wen-Jui. Waldfogel, Jane. 2002. Maternal Employment and Child cognitive Outcomes in the First Three Years of Life The NICHD Study of primeval Child Care. Child Development, July/August 2002, Volume 73, Number 4, pages 1052-1072.Conger, R. D., & international ampere Eld er, G. H. 1994. Families In Troubled Times Adapting to Change in Rural the States. Hawthorne, NY Aldine DeGruyter.Dearing, E., McCartney, K., & Taylor, B. A. 2001. Change in family income-to-needs matters more for children with less. Child Development, 72, 1779-1793.Working Mothers do not Adversely Impact on Childrens Diets. 2005. Sci Tech. Retrieved July 11, 2007 from