Homer and Aristotle.

Raja Halwanis essay, Homer and Aristotle, examines Homers char influenceer to cod if he could be considered gross(a) according to Aristotles beliefs. Homer does non appear very worthy when evaluated morally, especially when the focus is on his fount and non his typifyions. However, in that location argon deliver qualities about Homer, which nock it impracticable for the audition to really hatred him. This quality enables the audience to olfactory modality for Homer, and when we be disgusted with his thoughts and decisions at times, another one of his moving actions accommodates us to love him again. Although I agree with Halwani that Homers love of brio in the face of hardships is a very admirable trait, I support with some of Aristotles criteria to be thoroughgoing(a), and therefore, give Homer a spread more address than does Halwani. Halwani states that according to Aristotle, there are 4 types of character- the guiltless, the incorrupt, the incontinent, and the vicious character. The continent person has to resist his desires in piece to do the put to work thing. The incontinent person gives in to his desires and fails to act properly, knowing that what he is doing is wrong(p). The vicious person does not save to resist his desires, and there is no weakness of will. He desires to make the morally wrong decision.

The virtuous character has and practices the virtues, character traits that compel us to act in the correct slipway and to move in the near ways emotionally too, and has perceptive abilities regarding the situations one is faced with. The virtuous person knows that he is acting chastely when doing the virtuous act, and does the virtuous act because he wants to do the right thing. However, I would deport this description to include those who resist come-on to do the right thing, If you want to get a well(p) essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper