Writing tips and writing guidelines for students,case study samples, admission essay examples, book reviews, paper writing tips, college essays, research proposal samples
Saturday, 19 October 2019
Analysis On Bharati Mukherjee English Literature Essay
Analysis On Bharati Mukherjee English Literature Essay In turn, Mukherjee lays claim to an America that is both constantly transforming, and transformed by, the new immigrant. As the title of her short stories collection ââ¬Å"The Middle Manâ⬠and Other Stories (1988) suggests, each protagonist from a different part of the world functions as a mediator of cultures, negotiating the ââ¬Å"two-way transformationâ⬠(Mukherjee, ââ¬Å"AUPâ⬠141) of either an expatriate or immigrant experience in America. That the collection won the National Book Critics Circle Award undeniably affirms the appeal of such a Maximalist narrative strategy professing to give an equal voice to each immigrant group. On further analysis, however, it is clear that Mukherjeeââ¬â¢s representation of a fluid American (trans)national identity influenced by diversity is ultimately predicated on the foregrounding of differences. Despite Mukherjeeââ¬â¢s call for America to go beyond multiculturalism in its treatment of new immigrants, her own postcolo nial immigrant subjectivity-inevitably shaped by her elite British and American educational background-remains aligned with white hegemony, which continues to hierarchize its immigrants on the bases of ethnicity, class and gender. After all, Mukherjee specifically reveals in Jasmine that ââ¬Å"[e]ducated people are interested in differenceâ⬠(33). Keeping Mukherjeeââ¬â¢s explicitly stated literary agendas in mind, this chapter will attempt to examine the ironies in Mukherjeeââ¬â¢s postcolonial subjectivity in the novel Jasmine and the two short stories ââ¬Å"A Wifeââ¬â¢s Storyâ⬠and ââ¬Å"The Tenant,â⬠both from ââ¬Å"ââ¬ËThe Middlemanââ¬â¢ and Other Storiesâ⬠collection. Radical alterity of India From the vantage point of a successful female intellectual in America, Mukherjee disavows India precisely because its repressive patriarchy severely limits womenââ¬â¢s opportunities in life, insofar as the sanctity of womenââ¬â¢s lives is largel y disregarded and constantly endangered. However, ââ¬Å"feudal compliance was [precisely] what still kept India an unhealthy and backward nationâ⬠(Mukherjee, Jasmine 77). This necessitates that Mukherjeeââ¬â¢s heroines break the vicious cycle of being locked into arranged marriages that technically seal their fates with violent subjugation. In Mukherjeeââ¬â¢s short story ââ¬Å"The Tenant,â⬠Mayaââ¬â¢s claim that ââ¬Å"[a]ll Indian men are wife beatersâ⬠(99) may be an exaggeration, but the more disturbing revelation is that ââ¬Å"the groomââ¬â¢s mother was absolute tyrant of the householdâ⬠(Mukherjee, Jasmine 147) in India. Indeed, generations of Indian women have also been physically abusing female subordinates deemed to have transgressed patriarchal norms. Yet, when meted out to any woman who defends or is interested in the pursuit of an education, such domestic violence is clearly a violation of basic human rights, unjustified to an America t hat champions the inalienable rights of every individual to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. In Jasmine, Jyotiââ¬â¢s mother suffers strikes from her husband because she supports Jyotiââ¬â¢s aspiration to continue her studies and become a doctor. In the short story ââ¬Å"A Wifeââ¬â¢s Story,â⬠Pannaââ¬â¢s mother is beaten by her illiterate mother-in-law because she enrolled in French class at the Alliance Franà §aise. The fact that even these Brahmin wives are not spared the rod underscores that physical violence against women cuts across the entire caste system, denying all women personal and professional progress. These scenarios emphatically portray the radical alterity of India, insofar as it becomes utterly incomprehensible to Americans who privilege individualism and gender egalitarianism. Aligned with these values, Mukherjee attempts to consolidate her status approval from the American market by positioning herself ââ¬Å"not as [an] advantaged in side[r] of Asian culture but as similarly disadvantaged as [her] Anglo readers in finding that Asian component bizarre, distasteful, and difficult to comprehendâ⬠(Shirley Lim, ââ¬Å"AGâ⬠161) as well. As Mukherjee reveals, it is necessary to give Jasmine ââ¬Å"a society that was so regressive, traditional, so caste-bound, genderist, that she could discard itâ⬠(ââ¬Å"IMCâ⬠19) in exchange for a rebirth in America. In exposing the oppression inherent in Indiaââ¬â¢s patriarchal structure, Mukherjee situates her decolonizing impulse as one that embraces emancipation in America, a land that seemingly affords women endless opportunities to attain self-actualization.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment